The Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), developed by the European Commission (EC) and to be adopted by the FCA, will apply to all MiFID investment firms from 1st January 2022. The IFPR is intended to be simpler and more proportionate to a firm’s operations than the existing bank-like regulations. The result being that the vast majority of investment firms will be required to adapt their approach to prudential regulation.
Wheelhouse Advisors has a wide range of solutions designed to help you with your IFPR obligations. Our expert prudential team can help you navigate and understand the new rules and provide guidance on the requirements contained within the European Directives and Regulations, FCA Handbooks and regulatory technical standards from European authorities.
We conduct a full analysis of how the IFPR will affect your business. We provide a detailed report clearly outlining the implications specific to your firm, including those subject to change based on rules yet to be finalised and highlights of the key areas your firm should focus on to become IFPR-ready.
Understanding the evolving financial impact of the new regime on a forward-looking basis is as important as understanding the direct impact today. We work with clients to build robust governance frameworks, factoring in known or reasonably foreseeable events to identify adverse trends early and recommend pragmatic actions to avoid breaches.
We have significant experience assisting clients with designing, implementing and documenting their internal capital and risk assessment processes. We have incorporated industry guidance and best-practice into our approach over many years, which means that we have been practising as standard much of what is now mandated in the new enhanced ICARA process rules. Therefore, we believe are ideally placed to assist your firm in ensuring it has a fit-for-purpose ICARA in place for when the IFPR goes live.
We currently look after the regulatory reporting for many firms on a multitude of different reporting frameworks. Whilst this will be harmonised under the IFPR, at present two key elements of the new regulatory reporting regime are unknown; (i) whether the FCA will implement a lighter regime with an annual frequency for some firms; and (ii) whether the reporting will be integrated within the FCA’s GABRIEL system or if it will require third-party software. We will continue to track developments and will bring our experience to bear in developing an industry-leading solution.
The phrase “simpler and more proportionate” was originally a cause for rejoice among investment firms. The unshackling from the banking regime was expected to warrant lower capital requirement and less onerous governance standards and reporting obligations.
Many firms have questioned whether the end-product does indeed meet with the original objectives. For many firms the burdens will be significantly higher than now and for others there is at least a transition to manage from one regime to another.
Most notably, some firms will be required to hold significantly more capital than under the existing regime. Further, for many firms, the IFPR introduces a new obligation to conduct an ongoing Internal Capital Adequacy and Risk Assessment (ICARA) process, to document the ICARA in a formal report at least annually, and to make certain public disclosures. This is no small task, particularly for firms whose regulatory framework has, to date, been relatively light-touch.
21 March 2023 • Governance Risk & Compliance
As the UK moves toward a new financial environment post-Brexit, the FCA is beginning the process of shaping the new regulatory regime and is open to feedback from fund managers and investors through its latest discussion paper, which it will use to create an accurate picture of what investors and funds really want. The modernisation […]
16 March 2023 • Governance Risk & Compliance
Regulators globally are placing increased focus on the identification of anti-money laundering (“AML”) control deficiencies and Know Your Customer non-compliance. This places even more scrutiny on the AML officers who are charged with ensuring that an AML framework is robust and at all times compliant with jurisdictional AML regimes. In the alternative investment funds space, […]